Email | Print | 
.

Religious Liberty is Our First Freedom

Religious liberty is our first freedom. It must be guarded vigilantly against economic expediency, misguided calls to sacrifice liberty for security, and the aggressive attempts of activists to impose their agendas at the expense of our most sacred right. NARLA is dedicated to advancing the cause of religious liberty, not as a second class right, but front and center as our first freedom.

Religious liberty is called our “first freedom” and for good reason:

  • At the nascence of human history, God gave Adam and Eve the right to choose whether to follow Him. God thereby established a precedent for the human race that remains as alive today as it was all those years ago in the Garden of Eden.
  • Religious liberty is also the first liberty expressed in the United States Bill of Rights: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
  • But there is a third reason that this is humanity’s “first freedom.” There is no more sacred a space in the human experience than our search for the ultimate meaning of our existence. Repressing religious liberty is at its heart an attempt to extinguish this core of the human soul.
Limits on Religious Liberty

Religious liberty exists within a context of the rights of all those in society. Because religious liberty is our first right, it must take precedence except in exceptional circumstances:
  • Religious liberty is never a license to physically harm others, forcibly deprive others of their property, deprive others of their right to speak, travel or assemble, or to interfere with the attempts of others to freely practice their faith or not practice a faith.
  • There are many spheres in which religious practice may inconvenience others. In these lesser cases, religious liberty rights must prevail if the religious practice cannot be expressed in any manner other than one that causes inconvenience, and unless the inconvenience is serious and continuing.
  • In some cases, religious views and practices cause offense to others. Offense, the desire for conformity, speculative harms and minor inconvenience are never legitimate predicates for inhibiting religious views, beliefs or practices.


NARLA’s Religious Liberty Issues

Meaningful Constitutional Protection 
Sunday Laws 
Workplace Religious Liberty
Religious Tests for Public Office 
Censorship
Student Expression
Marginalization of Religion 
Media Bias 
Clergy Abuse
Religious Institutions
Hate Speech
Religion in Prison


NARLA Supports Meaningful Constitutional Protection

The First Amendment must be interpreted by our courts and legislatures to give practical protection to people of faith. In 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court heard a case involving a Seventh-day Adventist woman. In this critical case, the Court found that before the state could inhibit religious liberty, the state must show it has a "compelling interest." This decision was effectively overturned in 1990. The U.S. Supreme Court in Employment Division v. Smith reinterpreted the First Amendment in a manner that permits the state to impose laws on believers, even when by so doing they inhibit religious practices. In coming to its decision, Justice Scalia writing for the majority specifically cited Sunday laws as an example of the type of laws that the Court views as constitutional. 

NARLA and other religious liberty advocates fought back by supporting the Religious Freedom Restoration Act which reinstates the “compelling interest” standard. The Act was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1997. NARLA also supports state versions of this act which have passed in a number of states. We continue to support efforts in the remaining states that today lack a Religious Freedom Restoration Act. We also continue to battle in the nation’s courts in an effort to protect our First Amendment freedom.

NARLA Opposes Sunday Closing Laws

In all but one state, there is law that requires citizens to cease from some form of work on Sunday. While it is wholly appropriate to provide legal protection to ensure every American has the right to celebrate the weekly Sabbath of their choice, it is entirely inappropriate to force one doctrinal position on all. Such laws must therefore be challenged at every level.

For a full report on state Sunday laws, click here.

Click here for an exploration of the practical and theological dimensions of Sunday laws.

NARLA Supports Believers in the Workplace

If religious liberty is to be a reality in our nation, people of faith must not be arbitrarily forced to choose between their faith and their ability to earn a living. And yet today that is precisely what is happening to more and more Americans. According to the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the number of religious discrimination claims went up a staggering 83% between 1992 and 2006. In comparison, claims of gender and racial discrimination held roughly steady during that period, and claims of age discrimination fell significantly. 

What is driving this dramatic rise in religious discrimination in the workplace? It could be the legal impunity of employers who demean, demote and dismiss employees for no crime other than faithfully following God to the best of their knowledge. What we do know is that Seventh-day Adventist Christians are particularly heavily targeted because of their faithfulness to God’s Ten Commandments – including the Fourth Commandment which requires rest from secular pursuits on the seventh-day Sabbath.

Today we have an opportunity to stand up against bigotry in the workplace. There is a bill in Congress called the Workplace Religious Freedom Act that strikes a reasonable balance between the rights of employers to operate their businesses in a competitive manner and the rights of believers to be treated fairly. The bill has its opponents – both on the right and the left. But working together, under the grace of God, we have a chance to stand up for faithful men and women. Send your letter today to support this vital religious liberty legislation by clicking here.

Q&A on Workplace Religious Freedom Act

Text of the Workplace Religious Freedom Act

Alan Reinach and James Standish explain the Workplace Religious Freedom Act
Listen Now:

NARLA Opposes Religious Tests for Public Office

NARLA vigorously opposes any efforts to impose religious tests for public office, either by the government, the media or the general public. Those running for public office must be judged on their individual records, values and issues, not on their particular religious affiliation. Specifically, Muslims, Roman Catholics, Mormons, Evangelicals, Sikhs, Seventh-day Adventists, Hindus, Jews, Buddhists, atheists, and all others must not be barred from office for their faith.

NARLA Oppose Censorship of Moral Views

It is increasingly common for public officials to be targeted by gay rights groups in retaliation for expressing their view that homosexual behavior is immoral. Efforts to engage in the censorship of deeply held moral views are unacceptable in a free society. Public officials, like all Americans, have every right to speak openly of their moral, ethical and religious views, whatever their views on human sexuality and other moral questions.

NARLA Supports the Religious Expression & Practices of Students

While public schools must remain neutral in matters of religion, public school students have every right to express their views on equal terms with all other views. They also have a right to wear religious mandated clothing to school, to have time off for holy day observances/Sabbaths, to pray, and to engage in all other religious practices that do not threaten other students. Similarly, religious clubs and after-school activities must be permitted on the same terms as other clubs and after-school activities.

NARLA Opposes Efforts to Discriminate Against and Marginalize Religious Organizations

In some cases, local governments have used their power to exclude religious organizations from activities based on the moral views of the faith in question. This is unacceptable. Some particularly heinous cases include the Sea Scouts being excluded from using public docking facilities because they believe homosexuality is immoral, and the Catholic Church being banned from participating in an adoption service for the same reason. These discriminatory practices have no place in a nation in which religious liberty remains our first freedom.

NARLA Opposes Religious Discrimination in the Media

The mass media serves the function of the nation’s town square today, and the way it portrays people of faith determines in large part how they are treated. Media companies must, therefore, be held accountable when they present lopsided, inaccurate or inflammatory views of particular religious traditions, and religion writ large.

NARLA Supports Efforts to Stamp Out Abuse by Clergy and Religious Institutions 

Religious liberty is not a license to abuse of children or any other human being. Efforts to hold those responsible for abuse and individuals and institutions accountable for failing to intervene to stop abuse are wholly appropriate.

NARLA Supports the Autonomy & Authenticity of Religious Institutions

Many religious traditions express their faith through hospitals, schools, homeless shelters, care facilities for the aged, summer camps for children, and a variety of other institutions. The right to own and operate these institutions in accordance with the values of the faith is a basic component of religious liberty. These institutions are not religious just by the virtue of having a church referenced in their name. If they are to be truly faith-based, the people who work in them must share common religious values. Today there are efforts at the state and federal level to use government funding as a tool to undermine the autonomy of faith organizations.

Specifically, activists are attempting to use Medicare, Medicaid, student loads, payments to charities and every other penny of local, state and federal funding to force faith-based entities to hire those who don’t share the religious commitment of the religious groups that run the institutions. Worse still, they are working tirelessly to force religious organizations to financially subsidize behavior the faiths explicitly oppose – specifically, cohabitation and homosexual relationships.

Generations of people of faith sacrificed to build the hospitals, schools, and homeless shelters that serve as the backbones of our communities. Attempting to undermine the spiritual mission of these wonderful service providers is wrong.

NARLA Opposes Governmental Limits on Speech

While speech may be offensive and even hateful, it must not be outlawed. Having to endure offensive speech on occasion is a small price to pay for freedom of expression. Private individuals, however, have every right to vigorously express their offense and make their views known. This includes the right to request that media outlets stop broadcasting offensive messages, the right to boycott the businesses which financially support the broadcasting of offensive speech, and the right to expect that media outlets which use public airwaves provide alternate views to expressions that are offensive to a significant portion of society. There are exceptions to this principle, the most relevant being when an individual makes a threat of violence or incites others to imminent violence. In these rare cases, the speaker may be held liable.

NARLA Supports Religion in the Prisons

God can reach into even the most miserable prison and change the heart of the most hardened criminals. All effort must be made to ensure prisoners can respond to God’s love and practice their faith, within the context of the necessities of prison life. NARLA supported the passage of the Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act, which protects prisoner religious practice, and continues to support its broad interpretation. There are faiths groups in prison that engage in anti-social behavior and cling to violent ideologies. All the more reason to ensure that the love, purity and peace of true religion can shine brightly even behind bars. Only the power of faith can truly change the heart, and only a changed heart can reform actions. Thus the greatest crime reduction program on earth is the life changing power of God.

Conclusion

Religious liberty is our first freedom. It must be guarded vigilantly against economic expediency, misguided calls to sacrifice liberty for security, and the aggressive attempts of activists to impose their agendas at the expense of our most sacred right. NARLA is dedicated to advancing the cause of religious liberty, not as a second class right, but front and center as our first freedom.

 

     Support the sacred cause of religious liberty by clicking here.